Advertisement

CULTUREPHILE: PORTLAND ARTS

Posts tagged with: social practice art

Main Content Skip to Sidebar and Blog Navigation

Interview: Portland2012 Biennial Curator Prudence Roberts

Email
Artgym_portland2012

Opening reception at The Art Gym exhibition.
Photo courtesy of Disjecta.

Disjecta’s Portland2012: A Biennial of Contemporary Art is kicking into high gear. Exhibitions have already opened at The Art Gym, PDX Across the Hall, and Helzer Art Gallery at PCC Rock Creek, and the opening reception for the biggest show is this Saturday at Disjecta from 6–10pm.

To wrap our head around one of the biggest art events of the year (or two year, as the case may be), we caught up with the biennial’s curator, Prudence Roberts. Now a professor at PCC Rock Creek, Roberts was curator of American art at the Portland Art Museum from 1987-2000 and part of the team that resuscitated the Oregon Biennial at the museum in 1992 after a long dormancy. Now, she’s returning to the curatorial hot seat to steer Disjecta’s second go at surveying Portland’s rich arts landscape.

Take us through the curatorial process for Portland2012.
There were close to 300 submissions. I did about 50 studio visits and narrowed it down to 24 artists and artist groups. I didn’t go in with a thematic agenda at all. I’ve been here 25 years, and Portland has changed a lot, and a lot faster in the last 10 years. I’ve been out of the loop for a couple of years, because my husband died three years ago and I stopped going out. I felt like I was not necessarily an outsider, but there were so many artists who I was unaware of, and I wasn’t part of a hip scene. I think it gave me a certain objectivity that I wouldn’t have had otherwise.

What were you looking for in the artists you selected?
I’m always looking for work that has the potential to stand the test of time—that isn’t following an art world trend of now. I’m not looking for the wow factor, but a sense of integrity. But also, work that is responding to now and isn’t backward looking.

Ultimately, when I was making the final selection, I was looking for a range. I didn’t want an all video show or all painting. I was trying to represent the range of things happening in Portland.

There’re five different exhibitions, ranging in size from one artist to nine artists and groups. What was your thinking behind how you curated the individual exhibitions, and can you give us a preview of the Disjecta show?
I think each show is a discreet exhibition with a certain scene and works that speak to one another. At The Art Gym, I think there is definite a sense of narrative, but interrupted narrative—stories that are told obliquely, incompletely, and not necessarily personal narratives. The Future Death Toll piece is kind of about mortality, and Chris Knight’s paintings have all these symbols and references so you start to read and are taken off on a sidetrack.

Then at Disjecta, let me start with Mack McFarland, because he sets stage for me. He’s done two videos that are mounted inside a small box. The viewer gets on a stool and wheels into the box. The video monitors are mounted on either side, so you look straight ahead and see both out of peripheral vision. It’s this notion of what peripheral vision is and the implications of the periphery, for me, that ties a lot of that work together at Disjecta. The images in the videos are pretty abstract colors and profiles. He’s drawing on a chart of colors developed by a eugenics theoretician about skin tones and things. The thesis is race is always in the periphery of our conversations. And also the notion of peripheral vision being necessary for survival.

Arnold Kemp is showing photographs of tin foil masks that he makes with abstract openings for the eyes and mouths. The photos themselves are fairly large, and each is framed in a different color of grey. Again there’s that notion of color—and I think he’s referencing skin tones—and the notion of looking and of periphery. Then Matt McCormick’s piece is a video project, but the LCD projector is mounted into a corner, so part of the moving image is seen as a square projection on one wall, and then as it moves onto the other wall, it progresses as though it’s disappearing because of the angle of projection. It’s distorted into a triangular projection and seems to flow down into a disappearing hole. And there’s an enormous, enormous inflatable piece by Brian Gillis. It’s stretching up to the ceiling. Its theme is a float that celebrates failures that turned into successes.

The Biennial’s mission is to present “a major survey of visual artists who are defining and advancing the contemporary arts landscape.” After looking at the work of nearly 300 Portland artists, how would you describe that landscape?
For one thing, I was really impressed with how much connection there is with other places—how many artists are working here and elsewhere. Ariana Jacob has done a tour for her American Society of Questioning Questions, Matt McCormick just had a film screened at MOMA, Future Death Toll has done performances in New York. All of this dialogue is happening outside of Portland, and I think that changes the scene here. Portland is just a much more connected place than it was in the past. And all of the uses of new media, which I’m still wrapping my head around. The things Future Death Toll does online are really fascinating.

Portlandia likes to reduce our arts scene to putting a bird on it. Certainly there’s more to it than that, but did you nonetheless see any noticeable themes or trends among the city’s artists.
I didn’t. Which I think is a good thing, frankly.

How has the landscape changed since when you were at the museum working on the Oregon Biennial?
When I was at the museum years ago, it was a much more vanilla arts scene than it is now. I would not have seen the work of Sang-ah Choi, who’s doing these extraordinary paintings about cultural experiences. I certainly wouldn’t have seen the work of artists like Future Death Toll, which is mixing it up and doing performance. I don’t think I would’ve seen the work of Mack McFarland and Ariana Jacob. There was this regional sense about art. Things have really changed.

If there’s one thing that’s Portland-y or Portlandia right now, it’s our emphasis on social practice. I’m not sure if it’s going on the same elsewhere, but since Harrell Fletcher [head of PSU’s Social Practice Program] got here, that’s a force to be reckoned with.

Roberts and a number of artists will give a gallery talk at The Art Gym on Thursday, March 15 at noon. The remaining opening reception takes place on March 31 at the White Box in the University of Oregon in Portland.

For more about Portland arts, visit PoMo’s Arts & Entertainment Calendar, stream content with an RSS feed, or sign up for our weekly On The Town Newsletter!

Add a Comment »

Tags: Art, Galleries, Marylhurst Art Gym, Interview, social practice art, Disjecta

Update: Public Isolation Project

PIP finally begins to deepen the discussion.

Email
Cristinnorine_joshuajayelliott

Guess what? This window goes both ways.

View Slideshow » Illustration:

Guess what? This window goes both ways.

View Slideshow » Illustration:

Cristin Norine has begun to respond to confrontations like these, with some honest answers.

View Slideshow » Illustration:

Guess what? This window goes both ways.

Tuesday brought an interesting development: for the first time in her stay, Cristin Norine, the Public Isolation Project’s glassed-in guinea-pig, finally commented on the plight of the homeless, which plays out daily and conspicuously in the Lower Burnside neighborhood. Her observations on the PIP Blog are as relevant as they are late-breaking: “It was one of the few times I have watched what happens outside of these windows,” she writes. “Most of the time I try to ignore what’s going on out there so that I don’t notice that I am being watch. I think I will change that behavior the rest of the time I am in here.”

Well, now we’re talking. 23 days in, Norine has begun to adjust her depth of field, focusing beyond her cheerleaders, on a bigger and more ethically challenging world. Perhaps Culturephile’s question last week about “attraction” and “preference” was worded too vaguely. Some of the thoughts that prompted that question were, more frankly, “How do you feel about being watched by people with no home, no job, or far fewer teeth than you have? Do you welcome their stares? Do you think they welcome your presence on Lower Burnside? How does that parallel the online experience, of having a public profile and being viewed by people whom you can’t personally relate to?”

Anyway, the next day, she delves in another direction, addressing some of the gender issues that the project inherently raises: “The fact that I am a woman living in a very public way I can’t deny that it’s a very voyeuristic experience for those watching. In some cases though, I think people watching are more uncomfortable then I am.”

Culturephile thanks Cristin for beginning to open up and address the questions that many are privately asking. A blog which had been droningly self-affirming, has finally begun to fulfill its potential as a forum for ethical and philosophical exploration. The next step? Hopefully, a continued willingness to tackle the harder issues, and an honest attempt to see herself as others see her. She’s got three days. We’ll be watching—because we can.

The Public Isolation Project will be active for the rest of the month of November. For a more comprehensive list of events, visit PoMo’s Arts & Entertainment Calendar!

Add a Comment »

Tags: social practice art, Public Isolation Project

phile under: illusion of intimacy

Five Questions for the
Woman In The Box

Halfway into her month-long project, Cristin Norine deftly sidesteps the darker aspects of public living.

Email

Meet Cristin Norine, the very visible inhabitant of Public Isolation Project, a glass-walled gallery exhibit on 6th and East Burnside (between RonToms and Plaid Pantry). Conceived by multimedia artist Joshua Jay Elliott, PIP requires Norine to live in a metaphorical fish-bowl for an entire month, letting passersby observe her activities 24 hours a day. To get her attention, they tap on the glass, text her, or message her on the internet. Meanwhile, to court burgeoning national interest, Norine recently filed this CNN report:

Yesterday, she graciously responded to Culturephile’s five questions—but didn’t exactly answer all of them. Notice that question 4 encourages her to acknowledge her own attractions and repulsions to members of the public—yet she quickly reframes it and only discloses her actions. In response to question 3, she denies any awareness of voyeurism, preferring to believe that a sleaze-free Lower Burnside passively watches her stretch and sleep.

A project like this one is designed to be provocative, intimate, and challenging—but people who live in glass boxes are apparently very reluctant to throw stones. With her savvy, soundbite-safe answers, Norine seems to close the blinds on some ugly-but-relevant sociological observations. Then again, maybe she personifies the social-media meme: revealing her form, but oversimplifying her feelings.

1. What is the hardest activity for you to do publicly: sleep, exercise, or email?

That’s easy. Sleeping is by far the hardest thing for me to do. Partly because I get a lot of people knocking on the window trying to wake me, and partly because the idea that someone is watching you while you sleep is uncomfortable.

2. Have you had an impulse to “act” during your activities? Exaggerate or contain/control your movements in response to the knowledge that you have an audience?

At first, I did contain my actions a little. Having people watch your every move 24/7 takes some getting used to. However, as the days go by I am noticing that I think less about being watched and go on about my daily activities normally. For example, I was uncomfortable doing yoga in front of everyone at first, but now it doesn’t bother me.

3. Have some men treated this display as a peep show? And if so, how have you responded?

I haven’t had any men make me feel like this is a peep show. Most of the responses have been positive feedback on the project on a whole, not toward me as a woman.

4. Do you find yourself more eager to accept some people than others as your audience? (People you find attractive vs. those you find unattractive, for example.) If you have that impulse, how do you address it, and do you think it’s justified?

I haven’t responded differently to people based on their attractiveness. I can tell you that I am starting to respond less and less to people in general, but I think that is because I am getting used to people watching me. I generally only respond to those that try to get my attention through the window with a note or some other creative way. That is becoming the most exciting part of the project to me currently. I like when the audience wants to participate in an interactive way. I can tell you that I don’t respond at all to the people that pound on my window late at night when I am trying to sleep—for obvious reasons.

5. Is this experiment reducing, or increasing, your appetite for privacy?

This experiment has definitely increased my appetite for privacy so far. I am getting used to the idea of living without privacy, but I don’t like it. I will welcome the day when I can do my laundry and cook dinner without anyone watching.

On the PIP blog, Norine reveals that a “more in-depth” interview with CNN is pending, and defends her easygoing style of coverage: “This is an art installation and not a scientific experiment so the findings are less important than the message,” she says.

Fascinated by this topic? Check out Digging Their Own Graves , an interview of a couple who stage mock-burials, or watch this gritty documentary about Josh Harris, a dot-com era pioneer of public living and social-media experiments:

The Public Isolation Project will be active for the rest of the month of November. For more comprehensive list of events, visit PoMo’s Arts & Entertainment Calendar!

Add a Comment »

Tags: social practice art, Public Isolation Project

phile under: gallery

Shine A Light

Portland Art Museum

Email
Wamp

Tonight PAM shines a light on Wampire, and assorted other pop attractions.
Photo by Tyler Kohlhoff.

It’s been a big month for Social Practice Art, aka the “no more snootiness, let’s get everybody onboard” strategy of arts curation. First there was The People’s Biennial at TBA, (which closes this weekend), then there was last week’s FlashMob performance of Marian The Librarian at the Central Library, and tonight, PAM gets in on the action, hosting Shine A Light, an evening of accessible adventure, within its vaunted halls.

Says Wampire frontman (and natural cheerleader) Rocky Tinder, “There’s so much rad stuff going on at this show! I’ve never been to one of these yet but people have been telling me it’s super rad! Weird happenings throughout the whole museum. Food and beer too. Not bad, Portland Art Museum.”

Here’s a condensed list of events and times:

DJ Sexy Cousin 6-8:00

Music From The Milieu 6:30, 7:30, 8:30, 9:30, 10:30

B-Boy Is For Break Dance 7:00

A Teaching Collection 7:45-8:15, 9-9:30

Two Boys, Wrestling 8:00, 9:30

Performance By Wampire 8:15

Guidance Counselor 9:45

Sallie Ford & The Sound Outside 11:00pm

Other attractions, including food and beverage provision, will occur throughout. For a more comprehensive list of upcoming events, visit the Arts & Entertainment Calendar anytime!

Add a Comment »

Tags: Art, social practice art, modern art, weekend picks, portland, Live, Galleries, Portland Art, Portland Art Museum,

phile under: TBA 2010

TBA 2010: The People’s Biennial

Ten Questions inspired by the most questionable exhibit in The Works.

Email
Tba_23
Photo: Jamie Coughlin
View Slideshow » Photo: Jamie Coughlin
View Slideshow » Photo: Jamie Coughlin
View Slideshow » Photo: Jamie Coughlin
View Slideshow » Photo: Jamie Coughlin
View Slideshow » Photo: Jamie Coughlin
View Slideshow » Photo: Jamie Coughlin
View Slideshow » Photo: Jamie Coughlin
View Slideshow » Photo: Jamie Coughlin

As you may or may not know, TBA isn’t quite over. For the first half of October, the gallery installations at Washington High School (aka The Works) will remain open for viewing.

The biggest single attraction is actually an extremely diverse gallery show called The People’s Biennial, featuring works from Pennsylvania, North Carolina, South Dakota, Arizona—and the quaint and quirky state of Oregon. A multimedia hodgepodge featuring everything from children’s drawings to hoarders’ collections to “outsider” works to documentary film footage about bees, not everybody knows what to make of the collection, but everybody wants to talk about it. It’s a showcase so varied that it seems—for lack of a subtler term—random, and curators Harrell Fletcher and Jens Hoffmann seem to have crafted a mission statement that simultaneously dismisses the arts establishment, and exalts the unknown, perhaps on merit of that status alone.

“There’s good crazy and there’s bad crazy,” says a hotdog vendor whose favorite TBA vis-artist is Storm Tharp. “Some of the ‘outsider’ stuff, if it’s just unusual, but it’s not really inspiring or interesting…then I don’t see why they picked it. Just because someone is emotionally disturbed, doesn’t make them an artist.”

“[My grandson] draws just like that,” said another visitor to one of the displays. “We should get his work in a gallery.”

Indeed, in an exhibit that strives for inclusion, one wonders what the criteria for EXclusion must be. That’s the first of many questions that the Biennial raised over here at Culturephile. We thought we might as well share our musings with you, The People:

1. In such an inclusive exhibit, what pieces were EXcluded, and on what grounds?

2. Does this exhibit contend that “art is everywhere?”

3. Pantheists have been reported to say, “God is in everything—so why go to a church?” By the same logic: If art is everywhere, why go to a gallery?

4. If someone has acquired a well-preserved collection of artifacts, does that person become that collection’s “artist?” Or, to put it another way, where does “found art” end and “collection” begin?

5. There is undoubtedly an an art to educational filmmaking. But there is also an art to baking a pie. Fixing a car engine. Cutting hair. Should everything that can be done artfully, be displayed as “art?”
If so, is there enough gallery space and curatorial initiative in the world to sustain all the world’s “art?” And if not, where do we draw the line between vocation and inspiration?

6. Haven’t modern gallery-goers ever seen things like historical artifacts, amateur paintings, hoarders’ collections, or ethnic subject matter?
If not, do they lack families and friends, neighborhoods and yard sales, where they would naturally encounter such things? And what does that say about the segregation of society?

7. Will everyone who makes Lego spaceships, be thrilled that a gallery features a Lego exhibit, or be miffed that their work hasn’t been “discovered?” Or to put it another way, where does hobby-crafting end, and art begin?

8. Should every kid be proud that kids’ artwork is represented, or should every parent feel insulted that the display in the gallery so closely resembles the display on their home fridge—but offers no forum to their kids? Aren’t all kids special?

9. How did the masterful, precise black-and-white paintings get in this mix? Aren’t they too classically artistic?

10. Is the Biennial’s ultimate intention to set an example to galleries to host more off-the-wall work, or is the point to get arts appreciators to look outside the proverbial box more often?

Please feel free to supply your own answers, or add more questions to the pile. Or, if you have yet to visit the exhibit, get over there. There’s a lot to see.

Add a Comment »

Tags: Art, Galleries, galleries, folk art, TBA, TBA 2010, The Works, social practice art

phile under: art talk

Incoming: People’s Biennial

Email

PSU professor and artist/curator Harrell Fletcher, PICA visual art program director, Kristan Kennedy, and iCI executive director Kate Fowle discuss the 2010 iCI exhibition People’s Biennial at the Lumber Room in Portland. Fletcher curates the People’s Biennial with Jens Hoffmann and Kennedy will present it as part of PICA’s 2010 TBA program.

Add a Comment »

Tags: social practice art

Advertisement