Advertisement

CULTUREPHILE: PORTLAND ARTS

Posts tagged with: Interview

Main Content Skip to Sidebar and Blog Navigation
kasher if you can

Interview: Moshe Kasher

Stand up comic Kasher tells writer Alyssa Jaffer how to survive some of his life’s craziest scenarios in preview of his new book, Kasher in the Rye, out tomorrow.

by Alyssa Jaffer

Email
Kasherintheryesmall

In preview of his uncomfortably funny memoir, Kasher in the Rye: The True Tale of a White Boy from Oakland Who Became a Drug Addict, Criminal, Mental Patient, and Then Turned 16, stand up comedian Moshe Kasher, who has appeared on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon and Chelsea Lately, gave us a survival guide for the worst case adolescent scenarios from his life. Reader discretion is highly advised. —Alyssa Jaffer

Scenario: As a kid, you were left out by the cool kids.
Moshe’s method: Show up to a birthday party uninvited and leave only after the birthday boy cusses you out.
In retrospect: “Well, of course, the great irony of cool is that the cool kids in middle and high school become the very uncool kids later in life,” says Kasher. “It’s the weirdoes and losers who have been taking notes for years on how to act that eventually pop out the other end of the social tunnel as artists, dynamos, and intriguing people. So, hold on… a day of reckoning is coming to those cool kids in the form of boring loveless marriages, fifty extra pounds, and too many children named ‘Cody’ and ‘Brittany’.”

Scenario: Your mind goes into a “people suck” spiral.
Moshe’s method: Start smoking in middle school.
The take-away: “The main thing to remember here is that people do suck. There is little you can do about this. All the assholes you have ever met have been people. They are the worst. However, you are people too. And you can do a lot to ensure you don’t suck. Be nice. Have fun. Learn Stuff. Love people. Don’t steal. Don’t troll on the Internet. Read a book. Watch Star Trek. Kiss your mom. Have a kid. Don’t have a kid. Do it all. Just don’t suck. Because the truth is, the less you suck, the less the people around you will seem to suck too.”

Scenario: Your Bar Mitzvah has a Holocaust theme.
Moshe’s method: Sit awkwardly in the chair of honor, smile unenthusiastically, and wish Snoop Dogg were performing instead of Mordechai Ben David.
Looking back: “Make the best of it! Do a two-step to a German waltz. Kill a Nazi or two. That’s how you really become a man anyway.”

Scenario: You walk into therapy, and after a series of drug-related questions, you are on your way to a psychiatric hospital.
Moshe’s method: Sarcasm, cuss words, and prescription drugs.
In retrospect: “Whatever you do, do not tell them about the voices. They will not understand.”

Scenario: You get caught stealing a bottle of Bailey’s from Safeway…at the age of 15.
Moshe’s method: Feel sorry for yourself while the cop releases you into your grandmother’s custody.
In the future: “Try to explain to the authorities that you were simply doing the bidding of a group of underage, gay leprechauns. They were having a party and needed booze and tricked you into getting them the bottle. It’s magic. What were you supposed to do?”

Kasher will perform on April 28 at the Mission Theater and read on April 29 at Powell’s.

For more about Portland arts, visit PoMo’s Arts & Entertainment Calendar, stream content with an RSS feed, or sign up for our weekly On The Town Newsletter!

Add a Comment »

Tags: comedy, Books, Interview, book, Stand Up Comedy

Interview: Portland2012 Biennial Curator Prudence Roberts

Email
Artgym_portland2012

Opening reception at The Art Gym exhibition.
Photo courtesy of Disjecta.

Disjecta’s Portland2012: A Biennial of Contemporary Art is kicking into high gear. Exhibitions have already opened at The Art Gym, PDX Across the Hall, and Helzer Art Gallery at PCC Rock Creek, and the opening reception for the biggest show is this Saturday at Disjecta from 6–10pm.

To wrap our head around one of the biggest art events of the year (or two year, as the case may be), we caught up with the biennial’s curator, Prudence Roberts. Now a professor at PCC Rock Creek, Roberts was curator of American art at the Portland Art Museum from 1987-2000 and part of the team that resuscitated the Oregon Biennial at the museum in 1992 after a long dormancy. Now, she’s returning to the curatorial hot seat to steer Disjecta’s second go at surveying Portland’s rich arts landscape.

Take us through the curatorial process for Portland2012.
There were close to 300 submissions. I did about 50 studio visits and narrowed it down to 24 artists and artist groups. I didn’t go in with a thematic agenda at all. I’ve been here 25 years, and Portland has changed a lot, and a lot faster in the last 10 years. I’ve been out of the loop for a couple of years, because my husband died three years ago and I stopped going out. I felt like I was not necessarily an outsider, but there were so many artists who I was unaware of, and I wasn’t part of a hip scene. I think it gave me a certain objectivity that I wouldn’t have had otherwise.

What were you looking for in the artists you selected?
I’m always looking for work that has the potential to stand the test of time—that isn’t following an art world trend of now. I’m not looking for the wow factor, but a sense of integrity. But also, work that is responding to now and isn’t backward looking.

Ultimately, when I was making the final selection, I was looking for a range. I didn’t want an all video show or all painting. I was trying to represent the range of things happening in Portland.

There’re five different exhibitions, ranging in size from one artist to nine artists and groups. What was your thinking behind how you curated the individual exhibitions, and can you give us a preview of the Disjecta show?
I think each show is a discreet exhibition with a certain scene and works that speak to one another. At The Art Gym, I think there is definite a sense of narrative, but interrupted narrative—stories that are told obliquely, incompletely, and not necessarily personal narratives. The Future Death Toll piece is kind of about mortality, and Chris Knight’s paintings have all these symbols and references so you start to read and are taken off on a sidetrack.

Then at Disjecta, let me start with Mack McFarland, because he sets stage for me. He’s done two videos that are mounted inside a small box. The viewer gets on a stool and wheels into the box. The video monitors are mounted on either side, so you look straight ahead and see both out of peripheral vision. It’s this notion of what peripheral vision is and the implications of the periphery, for me, that ties a lot of that work together at Disjecta. The images in the videos are pretty abstract colors and profiles. He’s drawing on a chart of colors developed by a eugenics theoretician about skin tones and things. The thesis is race is always in the periphery of our conversations. And also the notion of peripheral vision being necessary for survival.

Arnold Kemp is showing photographs of tin foil masks that he makes with abstract openings for the eyes and mouths. The photos themselves are fairly large, and each is framed in a different color of grey. Again there’s that notion of color—and I think he’s referencing skin tones—and the notion of looking and of periphery. Then Matt McCormick’s piece is a video project, but the LCD projector is mounted into a corner, so part of the moving image is seen as a square projection on one wall, and then as it moves onto the other wall, it progresses as though it’s disappearing because of the angle of projection. It’s distorted into a triangular projection and seems to flow down into a disappearing hole. And there’s an enormous, enormous inflatable piece by Brian Gillis. It’s stretching up to the ceiling. Its theme is a float that celebrates failures that turned into successes.

The Biennial’s mission is to present “a major survey of visual artists who are defining and advancing the contemporary arts landscape.” After looking at the work of nearly 300 Portland artists, how would you describe that landscape?
For one thing, I was really impressed with how much connection there is with other places—how many artists are working here and elsewhere. Ariana Jacob has done a tour for her American Society of Questioning Questions, Matt McCormick just had a film screened at MOMA, Future Death Toll has done performances in New York. All of this dialogue is happening outside of Portland, and I think that changes the scene here. Portland is just a much more connected place than it was in the past. And all of the uses of new media, which I’m still wrapping my head around. The things Future Death Toll does online are really fascinating.

Portlandia likes to reduce our arts scene to putting a bird on it. Certainly there’s more to it than that, but did you nonetheless see any noticeable themes or trends among the city’s artists.
I didn’t. Which I think is a good thing, frankly.

How has the landscape changed since when you were at the museum working on the Oregon Biennial?
When I was at the museum years ago, it was a much more vanilla arts scene than it is now. I would not have seen the work of Sang-ah Choi, who’s doing these extraordinary paintings about cultural experiences. I certainly wouldn’t have seen the work of artists like Future Death Toll, which is mixing it up and doing performance. I don’t think I would’ve seen the work of Mack McFarland and Ariana Jacob. There was this regional sense about art. Things have really changed.

If there’s one thing that’s Portland-y or Portlandia right now, it’s our emphasis on social practice. I’m not sure if it’s going on the same elsewhere, but since Harrell Fletcher [head of PSU’s Social Practice Program] got here, that’s a force to be reckoned with.

Roberts and a number of artists will give a gallery talk at The Art Gym on Thursday, March 15 at noon. The remaining opening reception takes place on March 31 at the White Box in the University of Oregon in Portland.

For more about Portland arts, visit PoMo’s Arts & Entertainment Calendar, stream content with an RSS feed, or sign up for our weekly On The Town Newsletter!

Add a Comment »

Tags: Art, Galleries, Marylhurst Art Gym, Interview, social practice art, Disjecta

the wet sprocket

Edward Pack Davee’s
NW Filmmaker Faves

It’s hard to make movies under gray skies.
OAC’s sole Oregon Media Fellowship grant-winner drums up excitement for this year’s Northwest Filmmakers’ Festival, and support for his fellow indie filmmakers’ uphill climb.

by Edward Pack Davee

Email
Filmframe_copy

Pack Davee’s film How The Fire Fell will screen at this year’s Northwest Filmmakers’ Festival.

Editor’s note: The Oregon Arts Commission has just awarded Davee $15,000 toward his next feature film, but this piece was originally posted mid last week, before the fest began and before Pack Davee’s win was announced. Davee’s first feature-length “cult” film, How The Fire Fell, is among this year’s festival offerings. Though the fest continues through the 17th, some titles Davee references below may have already finished screening.

Sometime in the early 90s, when I was very young, I made my first “big” film project. I was determined to do everything the old fashioned way, from splicing the work print, conforming the negatives, and syncing up reels of magnetic audio tape. I stuck with it and in the end had an actual film print of a 12 minute, 16mm film, complete with dissolves, fades, and an optical audio track. It was not quite a feature, but it was a huge undertaking for me at the time.

The next step for just about any filmmaker is to submit to some festivals. I did just that, feeling fully confident that I would be accepted. I sent 3 screeners to 3 different festivals and was rejected by all of them. (At the time, I didn’t understand the nature of festival programming and took it very personally.) To add insult to injury, I attended one of the festivals and was surprised that they chose to show a very famous, established director’s home video of his cat doing something cute, when they could have shown my film. Feeling discouraged, I regressed to tinkering around with visual ideas, not really finishing much for actual screening purposes, and I didn’t submit anything else to a filmfest for a very long time.

Now, I know full well that festival rejections are a way of life for filmmakers, and that it was silly for me to be so discouraged. It’s not uncommon for a film to get rejected by more than 20 festivals before being accepted into just one. It’s part of the process. It’s not a great system by any means, but for the time being, there aren’t many other options. The cost of submitting to most festivals is pretty high, and submitting to several of them can quickly sink a struggling filmmaker much deeper into that terrible hole of credit debt. Luckily, that’s where more localized festivals like NWFilm Center’s NW Filmmakers’ Festival can be a huge help. There’s no entry fee, and it offers filmmakers a chance to be shown on their own turf, get some attention for their hard work, and hopefully make some like-minded new friends in the process.

I must confess that, so far, I have only seen one of the other films featured in the upcoming NW Filmmakers’ Festival lineup. I should also note that, even as I send out an endless stream of obnoxious reminders and event invites on Facebook, desperately trying to get people to see my own work, I have not been returning the favor to others. It’s not that I don’t want to, it’s just that filmmaking turns you into somewhat of a self-consumed monster. It zaps energy from your system. It traumatizes you. It degrades and humiliates you, taking you to some very low places that are not always easy to pull yourself back out of. But it’s important in these self-consumed times, to step back and consider all the others who have gone through the same struggles and endured the same hardships to get work completed and exhibited. All of the filmmakers featured in the festival (and many of those who didn’t make it) deserve an audience for their hard work. I intend to check out as many films as I can to make up for lost time.

The NW Filmmakers’ Festival features a wide variety of different genres, formats, and styles of filmmaking. My initial reaction is that I’m very impressed with the number of quality documentaries coming out of the Northwest. How to Die in Oregon promises to be very touching and technically excellent. Various environmentally-themed works are piquing my interest, especially Queen of the Sun, which explores the world of bees, their mysterious disappearances, and what it means for the future of the world. If you enjoy crime mystery docs like I do, Confluence should be good for a thrill. And if you have infinite patience (as I do)* for long, drawn-out sequences of pastoral landscapes and rural lifestyles, Alain LeTourneau and Pam Minty’s Empty Quarter is a beautiful tribute to a part of Oregon that has little in common with ours here in the big city.

*Editor’s Note: Edward Pack Davee’s film How The Fire Fell is also resplendent with rural Oregon landscapes. Read Portland Monthly’s review.

In the feature-length narrative dept, there seem to be some very strong entries, each of which undoubtedly took years off the lives of their filmmakers. Narrative filmmaking is a tough business. I, for one, want to give these filmmakers a pat on the back and some encouraging words—they need it!

Lastly, I’m exited to see some of the site-specific works and multi-media pieces presented here. As with any exhibition of various short works, you can expect to see a few that just don’t connect with you. But stick around, and the next one just might blow you away! Like a buffet, these shorts programs offer a little something for everyone.

I can’t stress enough how important these screenings are to the filmmakers. Please give them all a nice round of applause after each screening. As you watch these films, think about the incredible amount of time and effort that went into each one of them. And even if you do not like everything about a film, try to consider what the cast and crew went through to get there.

Lastly: A shoutout to those whose films did not make it in. There but by the grace of a lucky break go I. I have no doubt that some very talented young filmmakers hit the cutting-room floor this year; let’s hope that they don’t become discouraged. To them I say, the name of the game is persistence. Festival rejections don’t mean anything. A film can be rejected by dozens of festivals yet go on to find great success and a huge audience. It happens all the time. In the meantime, a little support and encouragement goes a long way.

For more about Portland arts events, visit PoMo’s Arts & Entertainment Calendar, stream content with an RSS feed, or sign up for our weekly On The Town Newsletter!

Add a Comment »

Tags: Interview

too many 'toons man

5 Questions for Too Much Coffee Man’s Shannon Wheeler

The almost unbelievably prolific cartoonist talks shop about his 5 titles.

Email
Shannonwlargeweb

Too Much Coffee Man is probably the “Portland-est” comicbook character there is: Perpetually underdressed and prodigiously overcaffeinated, he splashes through puddles staging wordplay battles and withstanding countless bouts of neurotic, unrequited love. Coffee Man’s creator Shannon Wheeler has recently added one more TMCM title, Omnibus, to the 12-high pile, incorporating a forward by punk provocateur Henry Rollins*—but that’s not all. In the current calendar year alone, Wheeler’s work has been published in 5—that’s right, 5—different books. If everyone who drank too much coffee were this productive, just think what a wonderful world it would be!

Culturephile catches up with the unstoppable Wheeler for five questions on the eve of his upcoming One-One-One-One show at PCPA, which will show off and sell off one-hundred-and-one of his one-panel cartoons from The New Yorker‘s cutting room floor. He’ll also be on-hand at a First Thursday reception to address whatever we don’t cover here—which, with five titles, should be plenty.

Tell us about each of the titles you’re currently promoting, and the upcoming talk:

I have 5 books coming out now; Too Much Coffee Man: The Omnibus, Oil and Water, Grandpa Won’t Wake Up, God Is Disappointed In You, and a second printing of I Thought You Would Be Funnier. It’s just weird timing that they all came out together. What’s weirder is how different each project is. The Omnibus is a collection of cartoons and comics going back 20 years. Oil is a serious graphic novel written by Steve Duin about the BP oil spill. Grandpa is a kids’ book that isn’t really for kids, written by Simon Max Hill. Disappointed is a condensed retelling of the Bible by Mark Russell. And Funnier is a collection of New Yorker-type gag cartoons. I imagine that the First Thursday talk will focus on the Oil and Water book, because the idea of using comic books (or graphic novels) as a tool for social justice really interests me. Overall, it’s the avenue I’ve explored the least.

In Omnibus, you seem to obsess a lot about the actual process of making comics. Would you characterize yourself as a “comicbook artist’s comicbook artist,” and how does the mainstream reader relate to this facet of your work?

Most people say that a particular part of the comic relates to something specific in their own life. If people have made comics, they tell me about their drawing/staple/distribution adventures. People also love talking to me about their coffee drinking habits. Lately I’ve heard a lot of stories about magazine subscriptions to the New Yorker. The mainstream reader…usually it’s the coffee they relate to.

Besides “God Is Disappointed In You,” how would you summarize the overarching themes of the Bible?

Besides disappointment? That’s tough. There’s a lot of “why you should dedicate yourself to this or that way of living.” Fear is a big motivator. Ecclesiastes is my personal favorite, even though it’s a relatively small part. It’s an odd bit of philosophy that feels like optimistic existentialism. I could relate.

What’s your favorite Bible story and why?

Hosea made me laugh. A guy with a slut for a wife and a town that mocks him. He’d say that he loves his cheating wife because God loves mankind even though they cheat on him. My cartoon is Hosea explaining that he loves his wife because she makes a great metaphor.

What inspired Oil and Water?

A group of Portland folk when to the Gulf to see the damage from the BP oil spill, but there wasn’t much oil to be seen. BP had erased the obvious evidence of the spill with chemicals and beach cleaning. But talking to scientists, environmentalists, fishermen, bar owners, politicians, musicians, et cetera, we found that the damage was profound. Fishermen couldn’t fish, plants were dying, scientists didn’t know what the effects were, and tourism was crippled. In addition to the environmental damage, there was damage to people’s lives that is profound. We very much wanted to tell the human story.

*In his own book Get in The Van, this legendary straight-edge loner recalls going to diners and ordering not a cup, but an entire pot of coffee for himself. A man after TMCM’s own racing heart.

You can catch Wheeler at PCPA at 6pm on Thursday, or view his work at the gallery through December.For more about Portland arts events, visit PoMo’s Arts & Entertainment Calendar, stream content with an RSS feed, or sign up for our weekly On The Town Newsletter!

Add a Comment »

Tags: Interview, 5 questions, five questions, comics

promo pile gold

Jay Clarke’s Instrumental Impulses

The man who plays with Dolorean and Grails and records as “Ash Black Bufflo,” waxes philosophical about an epic record that took him 5 years to make.

Email
Ashblackbufffinal-web-300x200

Jay Clarke’s press photo—like his mysterious music—leaves plenty to the imagination.

UPDATE: We’ve just learned that Jay’s music is included in Erin Leddy’s award-winning My Mind Is Like an Open Meadow, just reprised at the 1 Festival, a solo artist showcase coordinated by July’s magazine featuree Mizu Desierto. (Small world.)

The Culturephile promo pile—an ever-growing and periodically reshuffled mound of CD’s, books and postcards—sometimes yields a rare treasure. This was certainly the case with Ash Black Bufflo’s Andasol. Mysterious, moving, and worthy of several spins, this album compelled us to learn more about its origins. Luckily, local musician and mad studio scientist Jay Clarke expresses himself almost as well in words as he does in his resplendent soundscapes, so we’ll go ahead and let him explain.


What are some things that Andasol sounds like? Not in terms of band or genre names, but in terms of atmospheric noises.
Lots of stuff! I’ll go back a bit though….when I started recording the album, I had no great plan, so I settled on the idea of using everything—even things that were a bit nasty or destructive in my personality or past. One of the first tracks I did was a song my wife sang called “Summer Night with Silverware” that sounded a lot like what my great-grandmother sang on her porch in Kentucky (no running water, no electricity etc…). I added a field recording of crickets from that area, and it all came together after that. I realized at that point that I wasn’t going to make an album of songs, but of what it felt like to be in certain parts of the country—and to be honest, a damaged country.

That said, there are a lot of things that Andasol sounds like—the aforementioned crickets at night, the city din, crowds, footsteps in snow, car radios, some laughing girls, a bit of Finnish counting, my wife speaking Spanish, old how-to language tapes, a street performer…. Listed out like this, it reads like the bad abstract poetry I wrote in college—but hopefully it all makes sense in context. I’m not really impressed with field recordings on an album; you hear that a lot. But if it serves the purpose of the song, then I think you can use whatever you need.

This album is a soundtrack, right? How did that collaboration come about? Were you able to see the footage and use it as inspiration to create the music, or not?
Well, that’s not necessarily true. I scored a documentary called Marwencol and a song from Andasol is in the movie for a bit, but everything else on the album stands on its own. There’ve been a few reviews that have said they didn’t like the album until they saw the movie, at which point they really enjoyed Andasol because they could match up the music with the film. Unfortunately, that’s a bit of brain trickery on their part. And yet, Marwencol had a big effect on the album, for sure.

The short genesis story is, I did a documentary called Red, White Black and Blue awhile ago. Jeff Malmberg, future director of Marwencol, edited that movie. I was on tour in Los Angeles and saw him not long after RWBB and we started talking about what he was up to. He started to tell me Mark’s story and about Marwencol, and halfway through I told him that I’d do the score for free (though he ended up paying me out of his own pocket). That was that, really. Over the next four years I sent him about 150 tracks, and the majority of the movie was cut to that music. I scored to film later in the process, but I’d say 80% of the movie was cut to the music I sent along the way.

Can you give a brief account of your band resumé? What bands have you been in, and roughly when?
I was in the Standard from 1999 to 2006 or so, and we never broke up, just stopped. When the dollar amount is right, we’ll re-form and tour the world! Dolorean since 2000, Holy Sons for the last two years, Grails for about the last year and a half. In there are too many other bands to count for single shows or six-month jaunts, where I wasn’t in the band necessarily, but acted as an honorary member to help out friends and get free beer.

You recorded Andasol mostly on your own, right?
That’s right, I did it on my own—though my wife, who is a very good violinist, played a huge role.

What sort of headspace were you in?
It took about five years to complete, so I was in just about every possible headspace you can imagine. I think the primary headspace was what you might call “roiling abject failure,” if that’s a headspace, punctuated by moments of real joy. There is no greater fun than living inside your own world: moving the trees around, picking up the train station and moving it south of town, annihilating the town drunk in a car accident….It is a world of your making so the responsibility lies on your shoulders. At the end of the day, it’s your baby—or your town drunk, if you will. The problem arises when you realize that other people will be critiquing the hell out of your town drunk, so you better make sure his breath smells of the cheapest wine and his clothes are shabby in all the right places.

How many hours do you think you spent, over those years?
In those five years, I really couldn’t say how many hours I spent. A lot.

How many different instruments are incorporated in your album, and what’s the largest number of simultaneous tracks in a single song?
It’s hard to say—some stuff is actually sampled note by note, laid out on a keyboard and then played that way. It would be faster to just learn how to play the banjo, but I figured it made for more interesting sounds if I stuck a pencil under the strings and sampled that and screwed with it a bit. There’s an urban legend that Paul Bowles told his novelist wife Jane to just “use the hammer and nails of fictional technique,” to which she replied, “but I have to make my own hammer and nails.” I can identify with that brand of masochism.

Explain a little more about the mystic/composer Joaquim Laakso-Risti. How did you come across his work, and what aspects of your album were inspired by it?
This is a bit of a touchy subject. I have to tread lightly for copyright reasons, incredibly enough, but my wife and I spend a good amount of time in Taos, NM and came across Laakso-Risti there—actually in a town outside of Taos in the Sangre de Cristo mountains. Long dead now, but he travelled in the Southwest quite a bit in the 1940s, spreading the gospel of community music-making. He’d go into a town, get the people instruments (or invite them to make their own) and then they’d adapt some of his own music so that everyone could play a part, and I mean everyone. It can be a bit hard to listen to sometimes (Laakso-Risti’s neo-romantic tics can make your eyes squirm), but gradually an amazing process takes over where the community begins to right itself and, flat notes and tempo problems galore, they start making this very beautiful, hive-mind music. Folks that know Laakso-Risti’s philosophies can speak more to this phenomenon, but it inspired me to make music that was rough around the edges, more community-minded though from a singular place, eccentric-sounding maybe. I’d say three songs on the album are directly linked to his work. However, the music on Andasol is in no way lifted from Laakso-Risti’s folk operas (what he brought into these small towns to play) but is instead inspired by them, their intentions and their spirit. If you think this sounds like lawyer-speak, you’re damn right.

What, in your opinion, are some advantages of making or listening to instrumental music over pop songs with words?
First, if I could write songs with lyrics and singing, I would. It’s a more direct way of making your point. That said, the advantage of making and listening to instrumental music is that (to totally mangle Emily Dickinson’s fine phrase) it “tells it better slant.” There’s enough gap for one’s meaning to be a little bit more slippery in purely instrumental music.

Say I want to write a pop song about a developmentally disabled man who is walking through the snow and somehow becomes a part of the cosmic whole (and therefore saintly) by his mere existing. Well, I’d need to have the right words and the right voice to get that across, and to be honest, I don’t have those words and I certainly don’t have that voice. If I want to do this same thing in an instrumental, I have heavy steps in snow, the sound of my wife and her niece singing and harmonizing what sounds like the word NO, church bells, a distorted guitar feeding back, heavy breathing and a big portentous title like “Greatness Strikes Where it Pleases,” and then it’s up to you to fill in the gaps. I’m not so delusional that I think someone will listen to the track and say “Hey, that sounds like a mute achieving sainthood,” but that’s the point: I don’t think you need everything laid out in front of you. Those sounds add up to what I’m shooting for, and for the purpose of that song, maybe it is even more what I’m shooting for than if I had lyrics. I’m not totally sure. Sometimes I give myself the puzzle of writing lyrics to the ideas of some of these songs, and it ends up making me laugh. I wouldn’t want to know me if I made that album.

How did you choose the few words that are included in the album, and what do they mean to you?
Great question, because it all matters in the end though it might not to the listener. The stuff that’s chosen is purposefully mundane in spots. In order to make room for the music, some words end up as instruments. I’m not so married to how deep they are. In some tracks, the words carry the entire load and lay out the album’s intentions. I love hip-hop albums that start off with a spoken track that lays out what is about to happen: “I’m a bad mother,” “I’m about to destroy”…I like the confidence in that. The problem for me is that even though you use the language and the subjects of your life, you can’t go home again. That place and time is a kind of hell, and yet, it’s your hell. So use hell, just make it interesting. Andasol ended up a being a way to lie about things that actually happened—it’s my life, but it has nothing to do with me.

Lastly, the counting in “Finnish” halfway through “Go ’way Old Ghosts” is for my wife, who is half-Finnish and who has saved my life, so you ask me what the words mean to me—that little nod to her means everything.

For more about Portland arts events, visit PoMo’s Arts & Entertainment Calendar, stream content with an RSS feed, or sign up for our weekly On The Town Newsletter!

Add a Comment »

Tags: music, Interview

music

Interview: Sallie Ford

Sallie Ford talks about writing, singing, and the hometown she gradually grew to love.

Email
Sallieford9

Sallie Ford with bandmates Jeffrey Munger, Tyler Tornfelt, and Ford Tennis.

Last Tuesday Sallie Ford & The Sound Outside welcomed a respectable crowd to east-side record hub Music Millenium, playing a short set and signing copies of their debut full-length release, Dirty Radio. Despite their undeniably tight playing, the juke-rock revivalists kept a casual vibe. “I’m the boss!” Sallie blurted as the group debated song selection. Guitarist Jeff Munger snatched off his trucker cap and playfully swatted her.

But she has a point: Rising quickly from South Carolinian obscurity to Portland name-recognition, and now taking flight for international fame, Sallie Ford has become the master of her domain. Culturephile checks in with her on the cusp of a two-night stint at Doug Fir that will kick off her North American tour.

Three years ago, you were working as a server at a Thai restaurant on Hawthorne and having a hard time getting local bands to return your emails. Since then, you’ve acquired a tight band (The Sound Outside), a great label (Partisan), and the chance to tour the world. How does that feel? It was a Vietnamese restaurant, and I’m very glad I’m not working there anymore! It’s great that music is my job now, but that also means it can be a lot of work. Any unexpected challenges? Some unexpected challenges have been learning about the business side of things and learning to be patient and make good choices.

Your music has been described a few different ways. I’m inclined to call it “Rockabilly,” because that’s a classic form and a fun word—but what do you call it? My easy answer about how to describe my music is: “Rock n Roll.”

Fair enough. Tell us about your songwriting process. Lately, I usually will come up with a melody, and then lyrics, and then I add guitar chords. But I’ve also written guitar chords, then a melody, then lyrics. And occasionally I’ve written lyrics, then fit them to music. I mostly like to just see what comes out, and I never overthink things….I hope that makes sense.

You were already singing in South Carolina before you moved here. How did Portland influence your musicianship (or did it?) I had done some singing in North Carolina before I moved to Portland, but I didn’t start writing my own music ’til i moved to portland. I think it was nice to have a fresh start and not know anyone in Portland.

When you sing, “You may think I’m a clown/ Who gives a sh- t about this town,” which town are you singing about? “Who gives a sh-t about this town” was somewhat about how frustrated I was initially with the music scene in Portland, but I wrote that song because I dreamt about it. I woke up with the melody and words still in my head. Looking back, maybe it was a prayer to find my own “scene.”
Now that I have met more people in the music scene here (and there are many many bands as you know) I have a totally different view on that. I think people are very supportive here and it feels like a great scene to be in. So, which town were you thinking of when you wrote, “I kinda like it here?” The “I like it here” song is called “This Crew,” and it’s the counterpart to “This Town.” It’s about my love of Portland, and of course no city is perfect. That song is mostly about the things I’ve seen and people I’ve met on Hawthorne Boulevard, which has been my “hood” for a while now.

What do you think is most unique/essential to your act: your voice, your songs, or your instrumentation?
I guess my voice is the most important. I love singing more than writing or playing music.

Tell us about your semi-famous freelance puppeteer dad. What great inside tips has he given you about how to manage a creative project?
Puppeteer Hobey Ford is my dad. He definitely has been my hero and role model. He has done a lot of touring with his puppet shows and gives great advice for performers on the road. He never finished college and has always been supportive and inspired me to be self-employed.

You’re (22? 23?) and, obviously, a woman. Do people ever tell you you’re "great for a girl,” or better than they thought you’d be? Do you think the pop music climate, and the touring circuit, are getting more female-friendly? I’m 23. I haven’t heard that before, but I guess maybe I have heard people be surprised that my music is more rockin’ then they expected. I think people are very supportive to touring women musicians, but I don’t have much to compare that to.

Where are you most excited to travel and why?
I’m excited to go to Charleston, SC because we’re gonna go to the beach while we’re there. I grew up going to Folly Beach, and it’s nice to have a paid vacation there! I’m also excited to go to New Orleans and Montreal. I’ve wanted to go to both those places for a while.

Sallie Ford and The Sound Outside will be at the Doug Fir Lounge June 3 and 4, promoting new album Dirty Radio. Sneak a listen here:


For more about Portland arts events, visit PoMo’s Arts & Entertainment Calendar, stream content with an RSS feed, or sign up for our weekly On The Town Newsletter!

Add a Comment »

Tags: music, Interview, album, Radio, tune in

dance

Barak Marshall

The award-winning Israeli choreographer of MONGER talks about storytelling, overcoming ethnic tensions, and helping audiences “get” dance.

Email
Barak_marshall

On Tuesday, White Bird Dance will present Barak Marshall’s MONGER, a dynamic physical-theater piece that depicts a group of servants scrapping and scuttling to please their abusive mistress. Culturephile caught up with MONGER’s creator, Barak Marshall, for a little interview about this intriguing piece, and the philosophies that inform his larger vision.

The detailed gestures in MONGER really mimic the movement of people who are “on the clock.” Jumpy and perfunctory. Where did you pick up this repertoire of gestures?

I see movement as words so I search for the gesture or phrase that expresses the emotion, word or subtext that I am trying to get the dancer to “speak” with his or her body. Much of the gestural work is drawn from the daily pedestrian as well as folkloric gestures of my own Yemenite-Jewish heritage.

The choreography in MONGER doesn’t seem to have an obvious principal dancer, and yet the woman in the reddish dress seems to be the de-facto principal, demanding just SLIGHTLY more attention than the rest. Is this an expression of a natural hierarchy or “pecking order” that emerges even among supposed equals in a work force? (Is the woman in the red dress a sort of “alpha-maid?”)

There is no principal. I just created various stories on the different dancers. But as the work evolved, her character’s story became one of the more prominent through-lines

You’ve spoken in past interviews about the Isreali/Arab rift, and how your company’s performances have been accepted by audiences on both sides. What aspects of your work communicate with both audiences?

Unfortunately, we don’t have many opportunities to perform for Arab audiences. However, on my first tour abroad we performed for a predominantly Arab/pro-Arab audience. This was in 1995 following the Oslo Accords. When it was announced that we were about to come on stage, an audience of 1200 people started chanting, “intifadah! Intifadah! Intifadah!” Needless to say, we were quite frightened but we decided go on with the show. The piece that we performed was my first work, Aunt Leah, which was a piece I built in memory of my aunt. The piece contains a lot of songs and texts in Arabic since my mother’s family are Jews from Southern Yemen. I open the work with a song in Arabic and the audience started quieting down. In the second part of the work, my mother accompanies the dance on darbuka (Arabic drum) and ends it with an ululation—several members of the audience ululated back. The third section of the work contains a lot of sayings, curses and words of wisdom in Arabic and many of the audience members understood the Arabic and began laughing at the humorous parts. The final section of the work is danced to a piece my the famous Pakisani singer, Nusrat Fatah Ali Kahn. The audience began dancing in the aisles and at the end of the show they gave us a standing ovation. This is one example of how art can speak beyond political lines.

In some sectors of the modern dance community, there seems to be a disregard or even a disdain for narrative—and yet your work has a strong narrative thread. What do you gain by framing a dance work in a “storytelling” context, and what do you risk? How do you answer those who want to distance dance from theater?

When I tell people I am a choreographer many respond with a pained expression and say, “Oh…I don’t really get dance.” I agree. For me, dance must tell a story just like a play, film or novel does. I don’t think it’s a bad thing to communicate clear ideas to an audience. When you decide to tell a story you risk becoming too literal or not being true to the narrative arc that you aspire to present. While I do have an appreciation for post modern dance, sometimes choreographers rely on the abstract to cover up unfinished thoughts and one is left with a case of the emperor’s new clothing.

MONGER will be presented by White Bird Dance at the Arlene Schnitzer Concert Hall on Tuesday, May 17. For more about Portland arts events, visit PoMo’s Arts & Entertainment Calendar, stream content with an RSS feed, or sign up for our weekly On The Town Newsletter!

.

Add a Comment »

Tags: Theater, Dance, Interview, Modern Dance,

dance

Anne Mueller’s Ballet Memories

Oregon Ballet Theatre’s Principal Dancer reminisces about some of her favorite experiences as she prepares to retire this weekend.

Email
9399368-standard

Anne Mueller and OBT’s Artistic Director Christopher Stowell share a hug. This weekend she retires as a dancer and takes a new role with the company.

This weekend, Anne Mueller will dance three pieces in Song And Dance: a noir-ish ensemble number with chairs (Left Unsaid ), an agressive hiphop throwdown pas de deux (Speak ) and a lighthearted full-ensemble romp to classic showtunes and jazz standards (Eyes On You ). Then she’ll hang up her toe shoes and retire from a 15-year dance career, ducking behind the scenes to serve as a teacher and repetiteur. Before she goes, Mueller takes the time to reminisce in this interview with Culturephile:


Tell us about some of your favorite memories from your time dancing with OBT.

Gosh, I have so many of these types of memories….I think I could talk for hours about all of them! To try and capture a few:

Moments
Many years ago we did a tour to Colorado. It was a pretty tough tour as we performed in 2 or 3 cities in just 3 or 4 days. We had to deal with dancing a really physical repertoire at high altitude with no time to adjust to the thin air. The morning we left, we had just spent a very short night at a less-than-glamorous Rodeway Inn (which came to be known in company stories as the Roachway Inn). I’m sure there are many lovely Rodeway Inns in the country, but this was not one of them. Our bus call was at 4:00 am on a Sunday morning, which happened to be my Birthday. We were on the plane flying home and I was deep into a really good book. A flight attendant came up to me and started bugging me. I had a short fuse and really just wanted to enjoy my book. Just as I was about to let this guy know how I was feeling about him, he handed me a glass of white wine (an actual glass,not a plastic cup) and a card. I opened the card and was so very touched to see that my fellow company members had not only remembered my birthday, but had taken up a collection to get me a very generous gift certificate at a fantastic Portland boutique. I felt truly loved by a lot of wonderful people.

Years later, I got engaged to my incredibly awesome husband. We had decided that we were going to line up all the marriage paper work and such but not plan a wedding of any kind. First we thought we’d get married on vacation in Puerto Rico, but the extensive bureaucratic mess that would have been discouraged it. We decided to just wait until the mood hit us, then tie the knot spur of the moment. With this plan, I think my co-workers were a bit confused about how to celebrate the event. That was the same year that OBT launched the “Who’s Your Dancer” campaign. Designer Adam Arnold outfitted all of us for those first posters. He then asked Brennan Boyer and I to be in his Spring fashion show. He made a polka dotted dress for me for the show. It’s wonderful, cream and strapless with a poofy skirt and the polka dots are like spumoni ice cream. Lars and I discussed buying the dress from him after the show since I was feeling like “if there was ever a wedding dress that suited me, this would be it”. The price was too high, so we let it go. About a month later I walked into the dance studio for morning class and had that feeling when I walked in the room like everyone had just been talking about me (that awkward silence). I looked over at my barre spot and hanging there, tied with a matching bow, was the dress, a wedding gift to me from my co-workers. I love that dress!!!!!!!

I’m not sure why both of these stories are about fashion. They aren’t really about dancing, but they are about the bond that develops among a group of people that work so closely together under very high pressure; it’s very special and I suspect one of the things I’ll miss the most.

Pieces
In no particular order…
Serenade (Everyone who’s danced it says that; it’s like participating in an ancient ritual or rite of passage)
Duo Concertant (with my dear friend Karl Vakili, also later with Lucas Threefoot)
Earthbound (We only did it once, but it was very special to everyone who danced it)
Just (There is a short, lyrical duet that I danced with Alison Roper. It’s a small section, but so quiet, lyrical, powerful, and feminine. We are very close friends and this was made on us by another friend, Trey McIntyre)
Concerto 622 (a really joyful, group experience)
Rite of Spring (my favorite role ever, so challenging, so primal)
Eyes on You (which we’re doing right now; I love to see all the cast members dancing beautifully while also being wonderfully funny)
Bolero (truly life-affirming)
I’m sure I’m missing a ton.

Music
Would probably be the same list. There is some music that I love that I never danced to, some selections by Satie, Ravel, and Arvo Part.

Audience
Definitely the first time I danced “Go Ask Alice”. I had just joined the company and I had come here from a more conservative community (in terms of audience reactions). The curtain went up and many of the ladies (including myself) in the company were pre-set onstage for the “Breathe” number. The audience went absolutely nuts at the start of that piece, like a rock concert. They were screaming and waving lighters in the air.

You must have imagined being a principal dancer in a professional company, your whole life. Once you got there, what aspects of the real thing were most different from your dream?

Actually, during my training I was exposed to several professional companies, but none were ranked so I didn’t really develop with the ranking system as part of my consciousness. I did, certainly, dream of dancing lead roles. I’d say the experience of dancing lead roles certainly matched my expectation in many ways, but when you’re dreaming you don’t think about the stress related to such things. It can be quite high pressure sometimes. Of course, that’s part of what makes it thrilling.

What was your takeaway from your recent collaborative choreographic effort, Stravinsky Project?

I was inspired most by working with the dancers and watching them work with the other choreographers. Dancers are the fuel that feeds choreographers most, I think.

There’s an emerging audience awareness (and appreciation) of ballet as a physically demanding sport. What was your worst “sports injury,” and your recovery process?

While I’m delighted by this new appreciation of the physical demands of ballet, I don’t like talking about the injury thing too much because, unlike sports, the point of going to the ballet is escaping to a visceral, transcendent place. It’s hard to do that if you’re imagining the dancers hurting or struggling with injuries. I have, though, had a ankle surgery and did spend about a year sleeping in a cast every night.

What’s next for you after OBT—in the immediate future as well as further along? Vacation? Teaching? More dance performances?

I’m delighted to continue my work for OBT as Artistic Coordinator. I’ve been doing this part time for the past few years and will transition to full time as I phase out the dancing part of my work. I love the work this entails (setting and rehearsing ballets, assisting Christopher, working with the administrative staff on tours and various projects). I am going to go on a Southern/Eastern Oregon hot springs trip that I’m very excited about.

For more about Portland arts events, visit PoMo’s Arts & Entertainment Calendar, stream content with an RSS feed, or sign up for our weekly On The Town Newsletter!

Add a Comment »

Tags: Dance, Interview, ballet

from the p.m. pages

Q&A: Lewis Black

“Laughter is one of the few things
that allow us to hang on to sanity.”

Email
Black

Lewis Black is, we daresay, back.

Upon hearing that comedian Lewis Black will hit the Schnitz this week , events editor John Chandler immediately thumbed through some old issues and exhumed the following Q&A from June 2007. Though this issue of PoMo has long since become decoupage fodder, the caustic comic’s answers hold up fine.

Have you always been an angry comic?
No, the first stuff I did was all about my sex life—which was pretty funny at the time. The anger thing didn’t really come along for another 10 or 15 years. The stupid thing is, it was right there in front of my face. I was funny when I was yelling.

Whom do you find funny?
Dave Attell, Kathleen Madigan, Dom Irrera, John Bowman, Susie Essman, Judy Gold, Bobby Slayton—it’s a long list.

What do they have in common?
They all have a really strong point of view, and they don’t back off. They lead audiences to places the audience really doesn’t want to go sometimes.

So they actually stretch an audience’s comedy muscles?
Exactly! The nice thing about the current boom in comedy is that it does stretch that muscle. But it should have been stretched since the time we were kids. You know, the breakthrough of the first knock-knock joke. Laughter is one of the few things that allow us to hang on to sanity.

If there is a liberal media, would The Daily Show be its flagship?
I think we’re the flagship of the “How stupid are you?” media. We go through the day’s news and say, “Hey! Here’s what you might want to pay attention to.”

More about comedy…
More interviews…

Lewis Black will be at Arlene Schnitzer Concert Hall on Friday April 8. For more about Portland arts events, visit PoMo’s Arts & Entertainment Calendar, stream content with an RSS feed, or sign up for our weekly On The Town Newsletter!

Add a Comment »

Tags: comedy, Interview

from the newsstand

Five Questions for Isabella Rosellini

Email
Isabellarossellni_e_20090921103551

The actor-director-model-businesswoman visits Portland to discuss her career, her new Discovery Channel special, and bedbug love (maybe). Read article.

Add a Comment »

Tags: Interview, 5 questions, five questions, preview

dance

Dance Discussion: In Site Part I

Jeans, waves, wind…and a bright red stumbling-block.
A viewer’s impressions, and the artist’s response.

Email
In-sight6

Photos provided by Breck Warren. Click for slideshow.

View Slideshow » Illustration:

Photos provided by Breck Warren. Click for slideshow.

View Slideshow » Illustration:

Photos provided by Breck Warren.

View Slideshow » Illustration:

Photos provided by Breck Warren.

View Slideshow » Illustration:

Photos provided by Breck Warren.

For the month of March, Disjecta Gallery (8371 N Interstate) hosts In-Site, an installation by Karl Burkheimer combined with a series of dance performances staged on the installation. The next two Saturdays of In-Site feature Kathleen Keogh and Linda Austin. Last Saturday, Culturephile saw Tahni Holt and company (see slideshow). In case you missed it, here are a few lingering impressions:

REVIEW

To begin, there is one dancer*, making swanlike arm movements and brushing a bare foot along the floor. Her hair hangs forward, and ambient sounds haunt the PA, like rushing wind trapped in a can. It’s 1pm. Sharp. A crowd of fifty-some onlookers has sifted around the edges of an imposing slanted wooden platform, anticipating an improvised dance performance led by local choreographer Tahni Holt* and musician Thomas Thorson (Culture Machine). It’s an impressive turnout , especially considering its post-brunch timeslot and Disjecta’s far-out location. This is going to be something.

As Thomas Thorson holds down the fort, running sound and playing keyboard from a hole in center stage, five dancers emerge:
• A long-limbed, graceful blonde man in a red flannel shirt (Robert Tyree)
• A tall, slender woman with a balletic bun (Sally Garrido-Spencer)
• A shorter man with a seemingly subdued demeanor (Richard Decker)
• Two medium-height, medium-build women with medium-length brown hair (Noelle Stiles and Tahni Holt*)

All wear jeans, creating a look that is literally “pedestrian,” puzzlingly at odds with the performance-art-in-a-gallery context. As each denim-clad dancer begins to explore the space, we see sweeping gestures and varied postures. Slow rotations. Sudden thrashes. Creative ambulation. Walking, rolling, crawling. Many movements seem detached, incubated, almost fetal. The soundscape evokes the roar of a tunnel, a vacuum. And the faces of the dancers remain…placid? determined? blank. Music is sans melody; movement is, for the most part, sans pattern or narrative. There is nothing to attach to beyond a feeling of “happening.”

As a viewer who yearns for narrative, I start to seek it. I notice one dancer placing a hand on another’s back. This seems to inspire a natural reaction where the pair end up rocking back and forth together, as though the wavelike sounds were actual waves—or, more metaphorically, throes. Their movements speed up, peak, and then subside. This event happens more than once, with different pairs of dancers, and I can’t help but process these instances as erotic pantomimes. I’m relieved to see a couple of the dancers’ stoic masks crack to reveal a faint flicker of passion.

Hang on, what’s that? And has that been there this whole time?
What I thought was a blank stage, actually contains one object: a large red block, mounted on a wooden base. Think small sawhorse, hurdle, gymnastic balance beam—though it’s none of those things. When I see it, I think “stumbling block,” and my hunger for narrative practically growls. But as I watch dancers interact with the red prop, sitting on it, resting against it, looking at it…I realize it’s not going to end up meaning anything particular. It’s just one more object to explore.

Now there are Twister poses. There are electro-shock spasms. In a particularly inspired moment, three dancers brace themselves between the stage and the wall to make some acrobatic formations (see slides). In another memorable flourish of duénde, Holt kicks into a stomping rhythm, throwing all her weight on her forward foot, then rocking back on her other foot, her hair dramatically thrashing. This movement, proven hypnotic by countless indigenous dances, could go on forever. But Holt’s version is a brief dalliance as the music reaches a thundering crescendo, then wisps away into silence. Cameras stop clicking, notebooks are folded and bagged. I look at the clock: 1:41. It’s over. Right? Wrong.

The music resumes, this time sounding like a twinkly twilit bat cave with dripping stalactites. Dancers momentarily do windsprints. For 19 more minutes, there are more happenings, but I can’t shake the feeling that it’s already over. Now, I realize there was a predetermined schedule, and an hour is tidy in a way that 40-odd minutes is not. But while the 19 extra minutes didn’t minimize the experience of the previous 41, they also didn’t enhance it. If the group had been instructed to stop when the piece felt “done,” they might have walked off at the same time that the crowd tuned out, rather than cuing off their music guy, who must have been instructed to fill the time. By the time we hit 2pm, the dancers had (perhaps instinctively) crawled into the center-stage sound booth and taken the headphones from Thorson, almost as if to say, “Make it stop!” To be fair, I hadn’t realized how much I was “into” this piece, until I spent 19 minutes “out of it.” And if that’s part of the Holt & Co. strategy—well played. But if not, a note for next time: when you improvise a piece, maybe improvise when it ends.

While my wish for narrative elements fell on blank faces, sensory impressions remain. Moments of color and gesture, whips of hair, points of toes, wisps of sonic texture. This was a thing that happened. This Saturday and next, there will be more happenings, and you might decide to catch them.

TAHNI HOLT RESPONDS

Thank you for coming. It was a pleasure getting to move in and around the environment that Karl created with his installation. As part of his desires there was nothing precious about his work, it is to be walked on and explored by gallery goers. So although it is in a gallery setting he embeds In-Site with a lingering sense of construction. If you traverse the installation you feel the rough edges and the textured plywood. Underneath there is more refinement, visual patterning and curved edges. We costumed to match our feelings about the installation. It felt funny to wear anything but something that we couldn’t get dirty or would rip. Yet, like the installation, we did not stay in pedestrian movements (although we alluded to them certainly). We danced our training and moved with specific intentions that, at times, I would like to think highlighted the immediacy of now and our odd connections to each other, the installation, the space, the sound, the audience, etc.

As you stated in your review you are a “viewer who yearns for narrative”. These are your desires and wants, maybe needs(?), for a performance. The context that you are viewing the work from when your “hunger for narrative practically growls,” is at odds with the context in which we are working. And thus there is a disconnect. I think this disconnect is rich with potential for a greater understanding. Clearly there are many debates about what should and shouldn’t be in a review of dance. I fear this debate, yet I would like to offer that without discussing this disconnect you are doing your readers and our performance a disservice.

SUMMARY THOUGHTS

I’m sorry if you think this review does a disservice. I actually enjoyed the piece, and the confession that I “yearn for narrative,” isn’t intended to invalidate other kinds of work. That said, I don’t see the desire for narrative as irrelevant to a dance discussion, because many dance performances do contain narrative elements. I also want to clarify that I’ve described the movement in lay terms rather than dance terms not to dismiss your professional training, but to paint a picture for readers, regardless of their level of dance knowledge.

The craft of writing, like the craft of dance, can be endlessly refined. Placement of paragraph breaks, word choices, and instances of repetition all contribute to the overall impression that is left. I have done a fresh edit of the piece since the above response, and while I haven’t removed my few criticisms, I’ve put them in a more representative context. Something that sticks with me is the phrase “nothing to attach to.” Is that seen as a negative statement? And if so, is that part of a larger Western ideology? Readers, what do you look for in a performance—dance or otherwise? And if there’s nothing to attach to, are you disappointed, or do you feel more enlightened for it? Please feel free to comment.

The In Site series is ongoing, with Kathleen Keogh on March 12 and Linda Austin on March 19. All performances start at 1pm. For more about Portland arts events, visit PoMo’s Arts & Entertainment Calendar, stream content with an RSS feed, or sign up for our weekly On The Town Newsletter!

Add a Comment »

Tags: Art, Dance, Review, Interview, modern

tune in: radio

Tune In: Destination DIY

Learn more about OPB’s latest feature series, and meet the blue-haired host who “does it herself.”

Email
Julie7

Photo by Cameron Browne

Well, it’s a small world here in Portland arts—small enough that occasionally, a press release comes across my “writer” desk, promoting some project that I’ve actually contributed to in my off-hours “artist” role. Should I shun these projects in the press? Sometimes I do, on principle. But sometimes the same thing that drives me to participate in something, also compels me to promote it: it’s pretty good stuff.

In this case, the latter principle prevails, and I’m going to go ahead and alert you to an excellent local radio show. It’s called Destination DIY , and it’s been around for ages, springing up through KBOO grassroots, and recently reaching the limelight of OPB. As Portlandia calls the world’s attention to Portland’s thriving DIY subculture with sketches like “Put A Bird On It,” OPB has appropriately rewarded Destination DIY , a trendspotter of the real thing, with air-dates throughout March .

HOST JULIE SABATIER EXPLAINS MORE:

What inspired you to put radio and DIY together to form this show?
About five years ago, I had a lot more time on my hands and I was just getting into radio production. There was a half-hour monthly slot open in KBOO’s schedule, and I thought it would be a great way to discipline myself to really hone the craft of radio. (The production values of the early shows are pretty awful as a result.) The topic of DIY seemed like a great umbrella to discuss a lot of things I find really intriguing: people who apply their own creativity to all aspects of life, whether they’re artists, inventors, urban farmers or even economists! And I figured in a place like Portland, I’d never run out of material. So far, that’s been true.

What’s the weirdest thing you’ve ever heard tales of people “doing themselves?”
I heard that the actor James Franco is teaching a master class on himself and his work—that’s pretty weird. And there was a crazy article in Wired Magazine recently about a woman who does surgery on herself to “extend her senses” by putting magnets under her skin and stuff like that. Yikes! I’m planning a show on DIY Disasters, which should yield some interesting results on this topic.

Why DIY, when someone else could “DIFY?”
I think a big driver behind DIY is the sense of pride that people feel when they try something that might be outside their comfort zone and they’re excited to share the results. And that applies to all kinds of projects, whether it’s something really personal like planning a DIY memorial service or just fixing your garbage disposal. Doing something — or at least trying something — yourself rather than having someone just “DIFY,” is always a more enriching, enlightening, and empowering experience.

You also work on Think Out Loud; how do the two shows compare?
Well, for one thing, they have a completely different relationship with OPB. Think Out Loud is produced at OPB with a full staff (which includes me) employed by the station and Destination DIY is an independent entity and is produced by me as well as some volunteers, freelance producers in other parts of the country, and an engineer that I contract with. The show is licensed to OPB for a very small fee. Of course, the formats are also widely different. TOL is a daily, live call-in show focused on news and culture statewide and Destination DIY is an occasional series of documentary-style shows for which all the material is pre-recorded and is not focused solely on Oregon. Destination DIY is a self-directed project, which reflects my own particular way of looking at things, while Think Out Loud is much more of a collaborative effort.

Walk us through your process. How much raw audio do you capture? How do you edit and for how long? How often do you work on it, and how much do you do yourself?
My short answer is that a minute of Destination DIY translates into roughly an hour of work. That includes recording, editing, writing and mixing. It averages out to about 10 hours of work per week (on top of my 40 hour/week job) in a 6-8 week production cycle. If it’s just a simple back-and-forth interview, I’ll usually record between a half hour and an hour with a subject, and then cut it down to 5 or 10 minutes. If it’s a feature with lots of different voices and scenes, I might record as much as 8 hours’ worth of material and cut that down into little chunks. I transcribe the chunks and choose among them to start building a script. I like the story to really grow out of the audio, rather than writing something and trying to wedge the voices in afterward. I also work with other producers around the country, who pitch ideas to me. Once I accept a pitch and they’ve recorded their material, we might go through 7 or 8 drafts of a script before we do what’s called an “ear edit,” where they read the script to me over the phone and I play the clips from my computer to simulate what the finished piece will sound like. Once I have my entire show script recorded and edited and the whole show cut to time, my awesome engineer, Clark Salisbury goes over it with a fine-toothed comb, tweaking the volume, fixing bad edits, and making sure the musical interludes sound good. Clark and I work together to make small adjustments to the timing to get it just right. I probably listen to the full hour 4 or 5 times before it airs.

Destination DIY airs on OPB throughout March. Click here for air schedule . For more upcoming arts events, visit PoMo’s Arts & Entertainment Calendar, stream content with an RSS feed, or sign up for our weekly On The Town Newsletter!

Add a Comment »

Tags: Interview, 5 questions, five questions, Radio, tune in

Advertisement